EMIS vs. SystmOne: A Comprehensive Comparison for GP Practices

When it comes to choosing the right clinical system for your GP practice, two major contenders dominate the market in the UK: EMIS and SystmOne. Both are widely used electronic patient record (EPR) systems that help streamline workflows, manage patient data, and improve the quality of care. However, each system offers unique features, strengths, and challenges. This article will provide a detailed comparison to help you decide which is best suited for your practice's needs.

Overview of EMIS and SystmOne

What is EMIS?

EMIS (Egton Medical Information Systems) is a longstanding leader in the UK healthcare system. It is known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive electronic health records (EHR) capabilities. EMIS is a widely adopted system, used across GP practices, pharmacies, and various community health services. It is designed to facilitate patient care by providing access to medical records, scheduling tools, and communication features.

What is SystmOne?

SystmOne, developed by TPP (The Phoenix Partnership), is another popular EPR system used in healthcare settings. What sets SystmOne apart is its high level of interoperability, allowing seamless data sharing across different healthcare environments, including GP practices, hospitals, and out-of-hours services. This makes it a compelling choice for integrated care pathways and data-sharing between providers.

Key Features Comparison

‍

‍

Pros and Cons of EMIS vs. SystmOne

EMIS

Pros

• User-Friendly Interface: Easy to navigate, making it ideal for practices with less tech-savvy users.
• Wide Adoption: A large user base means many practices are familiar with EMIS, offering a robust support community.
• Integrated Patient Access: The EMIS Patient Access app provides patients with direct access to their health records, appointments, and prescriptions.

Cons

• Stability Issues: Users have reported frequent crashes and occasional system slowdowns, affecting practice efficiency.
• Manual Processes: Some features, like reporting and prescription management, require manual input, which can be time-consuming.
• Limited Integration: While it provides patient access, EMIS has limitations when it comes to data-sharing with out-of-hours providers and secondary care services.

SystmOne

Pros

• Stability and Performance: SystmOne is generally more stable and faster, with fewer system outages or crashes.
• Automated Reporting: SystmOne allows automated report generation, which saves time and streamlines practice management.
• Enhanced Communication: SystmOne provides advanced communication options, including SMS, email, and the Airmid app, improving patient engagement.

Cons

• Complex User Interface: Due to its more comprehensive features, SystmOne can be more difficult to learn, requiring more time for new users to get comfortable.
• Migration Challenges: Transitioning from another system to SystmOne can be challenging, often involving lengthy data migration and downtime.
• Limited Patient Access: While the Airmid app provides similar functionalities to EMIS's Patient Access, some users report it to be less intuitive and harder to use.

FAQs

Which System is Better for Data Sharing?

SystmOne excels in terms of data integration, enabling smooth communication and record-sharing across healthcare providers, including hospitals and out-of-hours services. EMIS, by contrast, often requires separate agreements for data sharing, making it less flexible in this regard.

How Do the Systems Handle Patient Communication?

SystmOne offers advanced communication options such as SMS, email, and integrated apps (like Airmid), allowing practices to communicate efficiently with patients. EMIS, however, provides more basic messaging, which may not be as robust for patient engagement.

Are There Financial Incentives to Switch from EMIS to SystmOne?

Yes, TPP is currently offering financial incentives for practices to make the switch to SystmOne, including referral fees and migration support. These incentives aim to encourage practices to transition to SystmOne, which is gaining ground in the UK healthcare market.

What Should I Consider When Choosing Between EMIS and SystmOne?

When deciding between EMIS and SystmOne, consider factors like system stability, ease of use, data sharing capabilities, and patient communication tools. For example, if your practice needs better integration with other healthcare providers, SystmOne may be the better choice. However, if user-friendliness and wide adoption are more important, EMIS could be a better fit.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right System for Your Practice

The choice between EMIS and SystmOne largely depends on your practice's specific needs. EMIS is user-friendly and widely adopted but struggles with stability and data-sharing. On the other hand, SystmOne offers more robust features in terms of data sharing and reporting, but has a steeper learning curve. Consider your practice's workflow, patient communication needs, and integration requirements before making your decision.

Introducing Hero Health: Enhancing Patient Engagement for EMIS and SystmOne Users

Regardless of which clinical system you choose, integrating Hero Health into your practice can help streamline patient communication and enhance your overall workflow. Hero Health offers comprehensive patient messaging, batch messaging, online booking, and triage solutions that integrate seamlessly with both EMIS and SystmOne. This powerful tool can help you provide the best care possible while improving patient engagement.

Explore how Hero Health can optimize your practice today!